Highlights the importance of using validated instruments and maintaining continuity of care to manage the complex symptom burden in elderly heart failure patients.
Validated instruments and care continuity may aid elderly HF symptom management; leaves open prospective validation of optimal tools and models.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The primary remit of terminal care in heart failure is to relieve suffering, which begins with a routine and standardized assessment of symptoms using validated instruments. The scope of this review is to explore symptom burden and control, and to examine some instruments used to assess and monitor heart failure patients' distress. RECENT FINDINGS: Elderly heart failure patients have many complaints and poor global health status. Symptoms are both of cardiac and noncardiac origin, attributable to the high frequency of comorbidities, side effects of medication and the psychosocial consequences of a chronic progressive illness. SUMMARY: Continuity of care, familiarity with the patient and the quality of inter-personal relationships between patients, relatives, nurses and physicians are essential to obtain high-quality end-of-life care. Validated instruments to measure symptom burden may be useful tools to quantify patients' distress and to evaluate the efficacy of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Opasich et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: