Why the study?
Does renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous dose of cinaciguat?
Does renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous dose of cinaciguat?
Cinaciguat does not require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment, as its pharmacokinetics are not meaningfully altered.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports no dose adjustment for cinaciguat in renal impairment; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
This open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of cinaciguat, a novel soluble guanylate cyclase activator in clinical development for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure, in individuals with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment compared with individuals with normal renal function. Cinaciguat was administered as a 100 µg/h continuous infusion over 4 hours. Plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Renal function had only minor effects on the pharmacokinetics of cinaciguat. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state was slightly increased in individuals with renal impairment. The total body clearance from plasma showed a slight tendency to increase with progression of renal impairment, which can be explained by an increased hematocrit in individuals with renal impairment. No relevant influence was found on the terminal half-life. The fraction of cinaciguat unbound in plasma was very low (<1%) in all groups. Pharmacokinetic variability tended to be somewhat increased in individuals with renal impairment. Adverse events were mostly mild, and their incidence was similar in all groups. In conclusion, cinaciguat, a promising drug candidate for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure, will not require dose adjustment based on renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lettieri et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: