Why the study?
Does exercise provide diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic benefits across the continuum of heart failure?
Does exercise provide diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic benefits across the continuum of heart failure?
Exercise serves as a crucial diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tool across the continuum of heart failure.
Supports exercise for HF prognostication; leaves open optimal therapeutic dosing in modern cohorts.
The present update is dedicated to the evolution of the interaction between heart failure (HF) and exercise and how the scientific community has handled it. Indeed, on the one hand, HF is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with a stable prevalence from 1998 onward varying between 6.3% and 13.3%. On the other hand, exercise is seen as a diagnostic and prognostic tool as well as a therapeutic intervention in chronic HF. More precisely, the knowledge, the clinical application, and the research interest on the mutual interactions between exercise and HF have different phases in disease progression: Before HF onset (past): exercise provides protective benefit in preventing HF (primary prevention). With HF present: exercise improvement with training provides benefits in HF (secondary prevention). The prediction of future in HF patients: exercise impairment, as a leading characteristic of HF, is used as a prognostic factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cattadori et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: