Key result
Cytosine-rich bulged RNA were more stable than uracil-rich bulged RNA in 1 M KCl, while divalent ion interactions were more favorable with uracil-rich bulged RNA by approximately 2 kcal/mol.
The sequence of trinucleotide bulges in RNA significantly affects its thermodynamic stability and interactions with divalent ions, impacting secondary structure prediction models.
RNA structures contain many bulges and loops that are expected to be sites for inter- and intra-molecular interactions. Nucleotides in the bulge are expected to influence the structure and recognition of RNA. The same stability is assigned to all trinucleotide bulged RNA in the current secondary structure prediction models. In this study thermal denaturation experiments were performed on four trinucleotide bulged RNA, in the context of HIV-1 TAR RNA, to determine whether the bulge sequence affects RNA stability and its divalent ion interactions. Cytosine-rich bulged RNA were more stable than uracil-rich bulged RNA in 1 M KCl. Interactions of divalent ions were more favorable with uracil-rich bulged RNA by approximately 2 kcal/mol over cytosine-rich bulged RNA. The UCU-TAR RNA (wild type) is stabilized by 1.7 kcal/mol in 9.5 mM Ca(2+) as compared with 1 M KCl, whereas no additional gain in stability is measured for CCC-TAR RNA. These results have implications for base substitution experiments traditionally employed to identify metal ion binding sites. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to quantify the effect of small sequence changes on RNA stability upon interactions with divalent ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carter-O’Connell et al. (2008) studied HIV-1 TAR RNA. Trinucleotide bulged RNA sequence variations vs. Wild type UCU-TAR RNA was evaluated on RNA stability and divalent ion interactions. Cytosine-rich bulged RNA were more stable than uracil-rich bulged RNA in 1 M KCl, while divalent ion interactions were more favorable with uracil-rich bulged RNA by approximately 2 kcal/mol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: