Key result
A nurse-led pre-implantation educational intervention for ICD candidates was feasible, achieving an overall consent rate of 87% and a data collection completion rate of 85%.
Why the study?
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidates have misconceptions regarding ICD therapy and unmet information needs.
Does a nurse-led educational intervention improve feasibility and patient-reported outcomes in primary prevention ICD candidates?
RCT (n=20)
Does a nurse-led educational intervention improve feasibility and patient-reported outcomes in primary prevention ICD candidates?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A nurse-led pre-implantation educational intervention is feasible for primary prevention ICD candidates, though consent and completion rates were slightly below targets.
AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) deliver therapy for life-threatening arrhythmias. Evidence suggests that ICD candidates have misconceptions regarding ICD therapy and unmet information needs. We undertook a pilot feasibility trial comparing a nurse-led educational intervention plus standard care, vs. standard pre-ICD implantation care. Secondary aims included examination of anxiety, quality of life, and shock anxiety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidates were consented and randomized to standard pre-ICD implantation care vs. standard care plus a nurse-led educational intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes included: recruitment rate, consent rate, randomization rate, proportion of participants able to complete all questionnaires, time to deliver intervention, and intervention topics completion. At baseline, demographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety scores were collected. Four weeks post-ICD implantation, participants completed the PROMIS, Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS), and Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS). Twenty patients consented (10 per group). Feasibility targets were achieved for all but two outcomes: consent rate was 87% vs. 95% target, and completion of data collection measures was 85% vs. 90% target. Consent rate was lower than expected as one patient declined, and two could not be approached. Completion rate was lower than expected as two patients were lost to follow-up, and one did not receive an ICD during the study period, leading to incomplete post-implantation survey collections. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a trial comparing a nurse-led pre-implantation educational intervention to standard care in an outpatient setting. Further study to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on patient-reported outcomes is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pannag et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidates (n=20). Nurse-led educational intervention vs. Standard care was evaluated on Feasibility outcomes (recruitment rate, consent rate, randomization rate, questionnaire completion, time to deliver intervention, and intervention topics completion). A nurse-led pre-implantation educational intervention for ICD candidates was feasible, achieving an overall consent rate of 87% and a data collection completion rate of 85%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: