Key result
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in young patients with congenital heart disease requires individualized techniques and thorough follow-up to address complications and psychosocial impacts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ICD therapy in young patients with congenital heart disease requires individualized approaches and careful follow-up due to specific complications and psychosocial impacts.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are increasingly implanted for primary or secondary prevention of sudden death in young patients with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, or channelopathies. Although major advances in ICD technology and implant techniques have facilitated ICD therapy in young patients, complications such as lead failures, inappropriate shocks, system infections, and negative psychosocial impacts are of concern. The various underlying cardiovascular disease states and a lack of standardized ICD protocols for young patients often necessitate individualized implant techniques, ICD programming, and follow-up. Young ICD patients need a thorough follow-up to ensure adequate therapy, and psychosocial problems have to be addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomaske et al. (2008) conducted a review in Congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, or channelopathies. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) was evaluated. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in young patients with congenital heart disease requires individualized techniques and thorough follow-up to address complications and psychosocial impacts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: