Why the study?
Does electrical stimulation improve nerve conduction velocity and vascular conductance in streptozocin-diabetic rats?
Does electrical stimulation improve nerve conduction velocity and vascular conductance in streptozocin-diabetic rats?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrical stimulation improves nerve conduction velocity and blood flow in a rat model of diabetic neuropathy.
The effects of unilateral electrical stimulation of the peroneal sciatic nerve branch were studied in streptozocin-diabetic rats of 12-wk duration. Stimulation was carried out over 7 days (10 Hz, 8 h/day) with chronically implanted electrodes. Compared with controls, there was a 25% conduction velocity (CV) deficit for the peroneal nerve supplying tibialis anterior muscle in the unstimulated leg, which was corrected by stimulation. For tibial fibers supplying soleus muscle, a similar diabetic CV deficit (20%) was normalized by stimulation, although soleus axons were not directly activated. In saphenous nerve, which has a functionally separate vascular supply, peroneal stimulation was ineffective. In anesthetized diabetic rats, stimulation caused an 18% reduction in tibialis anterior CV after 4 h. However, serial measurements showed progressive normalization of CV over 4 days of stimulation. On termination, CV returned to diabetic levels over 36-60 h. Sciatic nerve showed a 70% increase in resistance to hypoxic conduction failure with diabetes, which was halved by chronic stimulation. Acute experiments demonstrated that peroneal stimulation increased sciatic vascular conductance by 60%. We conclude that stimulation causes activity-related improvements in diabetic nerve blood flow and metabolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cameron et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: