Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scientific literature reports several possible ways for remote sensing (RS) to contribute to risk assessment for natural disasters, not only from a theoretical perspective but also in concrete applications. However, the typical RS scientist's approach to risk assessment has so far reflected one of the main limitations of the general risk-assessment process where several natural disasters are concerned. That is, to avoid facing the sometimes unmanageable complexities arising from interhazard or vulnerability dependencies, risk-assessment activities tend to focus on one hazard at a time, sometimes leaving dangerous gaps in understanding the real risk for a community or an economic system. Given the current trend in the risk-assessment community to move from a sum of hazards to a multihazard approach, this article builds on previous scientific literature to bring the same perspective to RS. The importance of the subject is supported and explained, a comprehensive review of the existing multirisk assessment approaches is provided, and tangible contributions of space-based Earth observation are highlighted in the different phases of the disaster-management cycle. Different strategies are discussed, and a specific example is presented in depth as one of the most promising approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harb et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: