Why the study?
Do model-based physiomarkers of cerebral hemodynamics differ between patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and control subjects?
Do model-based physiomarkers of cerebral hemodynamics differ between patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and control subjects?
Model-based physiomarkers of cerebral hemodynamics, specifically CVMR, are lower in patients with mild cognitive impairment and may serve as a potential diagnostic tool for early-stage Alzheimer's disease.
CVMR reduction may signal early hemodynamic changes in amnestic MCI; leaves open diagnostic utility pending prospective validation.
In our previous studies, we have introduced model-based "functional biomarkers" or "physiomarkers" of cerebral hemodynamics that hold promise for improved diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). The advocated methodology utilizes subject-specific data-based dynamic nonlinear models of cerebral hemodynamics to compute indices (serving as possible diagnostic physiomarkers) that quantify the state of cerebral blood flow autoregulation to pressure-changes (CFAP) and cerebral CO2 vasomotor reactivity (CVMR) in each subject. The model is estimated from beat-to-beat measurements of mean arterial blood pressure, mean cerebral blood flow velocity and end-tidal CO2, which can be made reliably and non-invasively under resting conditions. In a previous study, it was found that a CVMR index quantifying the impairment in CO2 vasomotor reactivity correlates with clinical indications of early AD, offering the prospect of a potentially useful diagnostic tool. In this paper, we explore the use of the same model-based indices for patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a preclinical stage of AD, relative to a control subjects and clinical cognitive assessments. It was found that the model-based CVMR values were lower for MCI patients relative to the control subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marmarelis et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: