Why the study?
Does sevoflurane reduce myocardial ischemia compared to propofol in patients with cardiovascular risk undergoing noncardiac surgery?
Does sevoflurane reduce myocardial ischemia compared to propofol in patients with cardiovascular risk undergoing noncardiac surgery?
This editorial highlights trial results showing that sevoflurane and propofol result in similar rates of perioperative myocardial ischemia, challenging current guidelines that recommend volatile anesthetics for high-risk patients.
T he question of what is the ideal anesthetic for patients with cardiovascular disease has been debated for nearly 3 decades, and, similar to the case for the use of perioperative -blockers, the answer appears to be increasingly enigmatic. In the current issue of Circulation, Buse et al 1 report the results of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of the volatile anesthetic sevoflurane versus the intravenous anesthetic propofol on the incidence of myocardial ischemia in 385 patients with known coronary artery disease or with 2 risk factors for coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. Using continuous electrocardiography and troponin T plasma concentrations as the composite primary end point of the study, the incidence of myocardial ischemia was similar in both groups (sevoflurane, 40.8%; propofol, 40.3%), calling into question the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommending the use of volatile anesthetics for patients at cardiovascular risk who are undergoing noncardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judy R. Kersten (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: