Why the study?
Left main trifurcation disease is an anatomically complex and challenging subset for percutaneous coronary intervention, requiring a summary of anatomical data and technical options.
This review summarizes the anatomy, PCI feasibility, and technical options for managing complex left main trifurcation lesions.
PCI may expand options in selected LM trifurcation cases; leaves open need for randomized trials versus surgery.
In humans, the most common anatomic variation of the left main (LM) stem is represented by its distal division in 3 branches (LM trifurcation) instead of 2. LM trifurcation disease accounts for ≈10% to 15% of all LM diseases and is often managed by cardiac surgery. Over the last decades, due to the improvement of interventional material and techniques, percutaneous coronary intervention started gaining acceptance to treat patients with LM disease including those with trifurcated anatomy. Yet, LM trifurcation stenosis with its intrinsic anatomic complexity (3 branches, at least 4 angles, wide variability in branch size and disease) is recognized as a challenging lesion subset for percutaneous coronary intervention. In this review, we summarize available data about LM trifurcation anatomy, its influence on percutaneous coronary intervention feasibility, and the evidence collected regarding the different technical options (including trissing balloon inflation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovacevic et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: