Why the study?
Does a multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention improve the rates of early aspirin prescription and administration post-CABG?
Does a multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention improve the rates of early aspirin prescription and administration post-CABG?
A multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention significantly increased the prescription and administration of early aspirin post-CABG surgery, improving guideline compliance.
Improved local compliance with early post-CABG aspirin via audit cycles; leaves open whether similar QI sustains adherence elsewhere.
"Early Aspirin" or a medium dose of aspirin 6 hours after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery is strongly recommend by international guidelines (EACTS 2007/AHA 2011 guidelines, Level1a evidence) to protect venous graft patency. However, compliance with Early Aspirin prescription at our centre is poor due to long standing hospital cultural practices and lack of awareness. We completed a two-cycled retrospective audit of 53 (September 2015 Baseline), 65 (January 2016 First Cycle) and 58 (June 2016 Second Cycle) consecutive CABG patients. Interval interventions included educational presentations, educational leaflets/posters, pharmacy liaison and modifications to e-prescription order-sets. Medical, nursing and pharmacy staff were involved in the audit strategies. Early aspirin prescription improved from 23% to 48% to 55% while administration of Early Aspirin improved from 17% to 38% and finally to 48% by second improvement cycle. Significantly, the proportion of patients with omission of early aspirin despite a clear clinical indication, decreased by 50% over the audit period. Important practical considerations were the last dose of anti-platelets preoperatively and amount of of bleeding from mediastinal drains post operatively. A multidisciplinary team based approach led to a 139% improvement in prescription and 182% improvement in administration of "Early Aspirin" after CABG surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parikh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: