Key result
Intravenous enalaprilat significantly lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure within 60 minutes vs placebo.
RCT (n=14)
Double-blind
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Double-blind trial demonstrates rapid blood pressure reduction with intravenous enalaprilat in mild to moderate hypertension, indicating effective acute management without adverse side effects.
The antihypertensive effect of enalaprilat (MK-422), an intravenous (IV), nonsulfhydryl converting-enzyme inhibitor, was evaluated in a double-blind study of 14 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The seven patients in the treatment group initially received IV enalaprilat 1.25 mg q6h for 24 hours. Thereafter, responding patients (diastolic blood pressure [BP] less than or equal to 95 mm Hg) continued receiving this dose q6h for an additional 24 hours, whereas nonresponding patients were increased to IV enalaprilat 5 mg q6h for another 24 hours. Baseline BP for enalaprilat was 161 +/- 5/107 +/- 2 mm Hg (+/- SEM), and for placebo it was 150 +/- 5/103 +/- 2 mm Hg. Within the first 60 minutes, a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP was noted in the enalaprilat group (P less than .05), without significant changes occurring in the placebo group. Although there was a gradual decline in both systolic and diastolic BP throughout the 48-hour study period in the placebo group, systolic and diastolic BP reduction was greater in the enalaprilat group, reaching a maximal decrease of 133 +/- 3/87 +/- 3 mm Hg. Adverse side effects did not occur in any patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (1987) conducted an RCT in Mild to moderate essential hypertension (n=14). Intravenous enalaprilat (MK-422) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction (p=<0.05). Intravenous enalaprilat significantly reduced systolic and diastolic BP within 60 minutes (P<0.05) and reached a lowest BP of 133/87 mm Hg over 48 hours compared with placebo.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: