Why the study?
Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity typically presents within the first year, but changes in cardiac function and biomarkers beyond this initial year have not been adequately investigated.
Does anthracycline-containing chemotherapy cause subclinical elevation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 24 months in cancer patients?
Does anthracycline-containing chemotherapy cause subclinical elevation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 24 months in cancer patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subclinical BNP elevation was observed in over half of patients 24 months after anthracycline chemotherapy, highlighting the need for long-term cardiac monitoring beyond the first year.
The incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity typically occurs within the first year after chemotherapy, but the changes in cardiac function and biomarkers beyond this initial year have not been adequately investigated. We analyzed 105 consecutive patients followed for 24 months after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy at Fukushima Medical University Hospital from June 2018 to April 2021. Echocardiography and blood tests for cardiac troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were conducted at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after chemotherapy initiation. In the whole patient cohort, BNP levels increased from 10.5 [6.3-18.3] pg/mL at baseline to 19.2 [12.1-34.5] pg/mL at 24 months after chemotherapy (P < 0.01). Based on BNP levels at 24 months, the patients were divided into 2 groups: a BNP-elevated group (n = 57) and a BNP-normal group (n = 48). In the BNP-elevated group, time-course changes revealed that BNP levels remained stable until 12 months, but increased at 24 months. Multivariate logistic analysis identified age, total anthracycline dose, and baseline BNP levels as predicting factors for elevated BNP levels at 24 months. Subclinical BNP elevation was observed at 24 months of follow-up after initiation of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: