Why the study?
Does a horizontal long axis (RHLA) imaging plane improve measurement variability and reduce analysis time compared to a short-axis (SAX) plane for right ventricular functional analysis on cardiac MRI?
Does a horizontal long axis (RHLA) imaging plane improve measurement variability and reduce analysis time compared to a short-axis (SAX) plane for right ventricular functional analysis on cardiac MRI?
Using a horizontal long axis plane aligned to the right ventricle for cardiac MRI functional analysis reduces analysis time and measurement variability compared to the traditional short-axis orientation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a horizontal long axis (HLA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plane aligned to the long axis of the right ventricular (RV) cavity for functional analysis by comparing the measurement variability and time required for the analysis with that using a short-axis (SAX) image orientation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four cardiac MRI exams with cine balanced steady-state free precession image stacks in both the SAX and the HLA of the RV (RHLA) were evaluated. Two reviewers independently traced RV endocardial borders on each image of the cine stacks. The time required to complete each set of traces was recorded, and the RV end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction were calculated. Analysis times and RV measurements were compared between the two orientations. RESULTS: < 0.002). Bland-Altman analysis revealed lower mean differences, limits of agreement, and coefficients of variation for RV measurements obtained with the RHLA stack. CONCLUSIONS: RV functional analysis using a RHLA stack resulted in shorter analysis times and lower measurement variability than for a SAX stack orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaturvedi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: