Key result
Rotated long-axis MRI yields similar RV volume measurements to conventional short-axis imaging.
Why the study?
The conventional short-axis MRI method for right ventricular volume and motion assessment is limited by RV anatomy and shape, necessitating evaluation of alternative imaging orientations.
Does rotated long axis (RLA) MRI orientation provide accurate right ventricular volume measurements compared to short-axis (SA) orientation in healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=23)
Does rotated long axis (RLA) MRI orientation provide accurate right ventricular volume measurements compared to short-axis (SA) orientation in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=0.17 to 0.64
The rotated long axis MRI method yields comparable right ventricular volumes to the conventional short-axis method while improving visualization of RV structures.
Comparable RV volumes by RLA and SA MRI in healthy volunteers; leaves open validation in patients before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method for right ventricular (RV) volume and motion, using short-axis (SA) orientation, is limited by RV anatomy and shape. We suggest an orientation based on six slices rotated around the long axis of the RV, rotated long axis (RLA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three phantoms were investigated in SA and RLA using cine balanced steady-state free precession MRI. Volumes were calculated based on segmentation and checked against true volumes. In 23 healthy male volunteers, we used six long-axis planes from the middle of the tricuspid valve to the RV apex, rotated in 30° increments. For comparison, short-axis slices were acquired. Imaging parameters were identical in both acquisitions. RESULTS: Right ventricular end-diastolic (EDV), end-systolic (ESV) and stroke volumes (SV) determined in the RLA 179.1 ± 29.3; 80.1 ± 17.1; 99.3 ± 16.9 ml and in the SA were 174.0 ± 21.1; 78.8 ± 13.6; 95.3 ± 14.5 ml with P-values for the difference from 0.17 to 0.64 (ns). Interobserver variability ranged between 3.2% and 6.6% and intraobserver variability between 2.8% and 6.8%. In SA views, consensus for the definition of the basal slice was necessary in 39% of the volunteers for whom the average volume change was 20% in ESV and 10% in EDV. CONCLUSIONS: The RLA method results in better visualization and definition of the RV inflow, outflow and apex. Accurate measurement of RV volumes for diagnosis and follow-up of cardiac diseases are enhanced by the RLA orientation, even though additional acquisition time is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aneq et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=23). Rotated long axis (RLA) MRI vs. Short-axis (SA) MRI was evaluated on Right ventricular end-diastolic, end-systolic, and stroke volumes (p=0.17 to 0.64). Right ventricular volumes determined by the rotated long axis MRI method were not significantly different from the conventional short-axis method (P=0.17 to 0.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: