Elderly patients with idiopathic HCM exhibit distinct gender differences, with males showing more atrial fibrillation and adverse remodeling, and females more frequently presenting with obstructive HCM.
Gender differences in elderly idiopathic HCM are hypothesis-generating; leaves open effects on remodeling, course, or management.
Aim: To study gender differences of clinical course and myocardial remodeling in elderly patients with idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Materials and methods: The study included 131 patients with idiopathic HCM. Patients underwent standard clinical, laboratory and instrumental diagnostic methods. Results: In the elderly patients with idiopathic HCM, the proportion of females was 63% (n=82), males - 37% (n=49). The average age of females was 69±7 years, males - 68±7 years. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was more common in males (32%) than in females (22%), but were found no statistically significant differences (p=0.20). Atrial fibrillation was more common in males (49% versus 29%, respectively, p=0.03). Size of left atrium and end-diastolic size of left ventricle in males exceeded those in females (51.2±9.0 mm versus 46.3±4.7 mm, 51.5±7.6 mm versus 45.6±5,7 mm, respectively, p=0.01). In males, a symmetrical myocardial remodeling was established more often (42% versus 25%, p=0.04). Obstructive form of HCM was predominant in females (45% and 14%, p=0.01). Chronic heart failure (CHF) in NYHA FC III was observed in 29% in female group (n=24) and in 12% in male group (n=6), which tends to differ (p=0.06). In females CHF in NYHA FC III was mainly due to left ventricle outflow tract obstruction (n=13) and dilatation phase (n=3). In males, almost all cases of CHF in NYHA FC III–IV (8 from 9 patients) were as a result of a combination of HCM with CAD and previous myocardial infarction. In males, the ejection fraction was significantly lower (55.7±14.8% versus 62.2±10.9%, p=0.01).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Полякова et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: