Why the study?
Studies evaluating the relationship between gender and prognosis in pulmonary thromboembolism have yielded conflicting results.
Does female gender compared to male gender affect early mortality and prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Does female gender compared to male gender affect early mortality and prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite older age and higher sPESI scores in women with acute pulmonary embolism, early mortality does not significantly differ between genders.
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a disease that mortal and hardly diagnosed. Since findings of PTE are nonspesific diagnosed can be so hard sometimes. Major risk factors are malignancy, immobility, previous surgery, thrombophilia, advanced age, and genetic factors. Studies on the relationship between gender and prognosis in PTE have very different results. In this study, we aimed to evaluate gender differences in terms of prognosis, intensive care admission, laboratory, and radiological tests. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 348 patients diagnosed with Acute PTE between January 2012 and December 2015. All of these patients were patients who applied to the emergency department of our center, which is a third step chest diseases hospital. We used the PTE guideline jointly designed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) for prognosis classifications. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.7, while the male patients were younger. Women's sPESI scores and mean ages were observed higher than men. Although women had more bad prognostic factors, no significant difference was found between both genders in terms of early mortality. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although there is a difference between mean age and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) scores; no difference in early mortality between men and women. Gender studies in PTE are an area that is open to new studies, since the studies conducted on this subject give quite different results and these results may affect the follow-up protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unat et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: