Why the study?
Does the CYP2C19*2 variant increase the risk of in-stent restenosis in Chilean patients undergoing PCI and receiving clopidogrel?
Does the CYP2C19*2 variant increase the risk of in-stent restenosis in Chilean patients undergoing PCI and receiving clopidogrel?
The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was not significantly associated with the development of coronary in-stent restenosis in Chilean patients treated with clopidogrel after PCI.
No association seen between CYP2C19*2 and ISR; leaves open genotyping utility and requires larger prospective validation.
Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug especially used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Polymorphisms within CYP2C19 can result in important interindividual variations regarding therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the CYP2C19⁎2 variant (rs4244285) on in-stent restenosis occurrence in Chilean patients who underwent PCI and received clopidogrel. A total of 77 cases with stenosis >50% in the angioplasty site (62.75 ± 9.8 years, 80.5% males) and 86 controls (65.45 ± 9.8 years, 72.1% males) were studied. The polymorphism was genotyped using TaqMan® Drug Metabolism Genotyping Assays. Overall, CYP2C19⁎2 allele frequency was 8.3%. Diabetes, chronic lesions, and bare metal stents (BMS) were observed more often in cases than in controls ( p = 0.05, p = 0.04, and p = 0.02, resp.). Genotypic frequencies did not differ significantly between the groups ( p = 0.15). Nonetheless, the mutated allele was observed in a greater proportion in patients without in-stent restenosis ( p = 0.055). There was no significant association between the rs4244285 variant and the occurrence of in-stent restenosis after PCI (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.04; p = 0.06). In summary, no association was identified between the CYP2C19⁎2 variant and the development of coronary in-stent restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruedlinger et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: