Key result
CYP2C19*2 heterozygosity shows no significant link to 1-year in-stent restenosis after PCI.
Why the study?
The impact of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on the occurrence of in-stent restenosis after PCI despite adequate dual anti-platelet therapy was uncertain in Iranian patients.
Does the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism increase the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients who underwent PCI?
Case-Control (n=100)
No
Does the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism increase the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients who underwent PCI?
Odds Ratio: 2.5
p-value: p=0.273
The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was not significantly associated with 1-year in-stent restenosis in Iranian patients undergoing PCI, though the study was limited by a small sample size.
No association in this small Level 4 study; should not change practice and leaves open CYP2C19*2's role in post-PCI restenosis.
OBJECTIVE: In this case-match study, we evaluated the impact of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism in the occurrence of in-stent restenosis during a 1-year follow-up period despite adequate dual anti-platelet therapy in Iranian patients having undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This study, conducted at a tertiary referral heart center in Tehran, recruited 100 patients: 50 patients had in-stent restenosis after PCI during a 1-year follow-up and were compared to another 50 patients without in-stent restenosis who were individually matched according to sex. In order to evaluate the impact of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism, case frequency matching was performed with respect to variables previously shown to be predictors of in-stent restenosis. The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism evaluated using real-time PCR methods. RESULTS: Among all 100 patients (mean age=60.09 ± 10.29: 72.0% male), 89 (89%) patients had wild (CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*1) and 11% had a heterozygous (CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*2) genotypes, and there was no patient with a completely mutant genotype (CYP2C19*2/CYP2C19*2). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that there was no significant association between genotype CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*2 and the occurrence of in-stent restenosis after PCI (OR=2.5, p value=0.273). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that carrying a CYP2C19*2 allele with a functional CYP2C19*1 allele had no significant association with in-stent restenosis 1 year after PCI. The antiplatelet treatment strategy for non-functional allele carriers is still a matter of controversy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to determine the prevalence of non-functional alleles in various populations and to achieve a consensus about the effective treatment strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nozari et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in In-stent restenosis after PCI (n=100). CYP2C19*2 polymorphism (heterozygous CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*2 genotype) vs. Wild genotype (CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*1) was evaluated on Occurrence of in-stent restenosis (OR 2.5, p=0.273). Carrying a heterozygous CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*2 genotype had no significant association with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis 1 year after PCI compared to the wild genotype (OR 2.5; P=0.273).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: