Why the study?
Does statin use reduce overall mortality in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Does statin use reduce overall mortality in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Statin use is independently associated with improved long-term survival in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Statin use should not yet change practice post-EVAR; leaves open a causal survival benefit for randomized confirmation.
It has been shown that preoperative statin therapy reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing major noncardiac vascular surgery. In this report, we investigated the influence of statin use on early and late outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The study population, consisting of patients collated in the EUROSTAR registry, was stratified in two groups according to statin use. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were compared by chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for discrete and continuous variables. The effects of statin use on outcomes after EVAR were analyzed by multivariate regression models. Of the 5,892 patients enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry, 731 (12.4%) patients used statins for hyperlipidemia. Statin users were younger, were more obese, and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. After 5 years of follow-up, the cumulative survival rate was 77% for nonusers of statin versus 81% for statin users (p = .005). After adjustment for age and other risk factors, statin use was still an independent predictor of improved survival (p = .03). Our results revealed that statin prescription was more frequent in younger patients. However, when adjusted for age and medical risk factors, the use of statin in patients who underwent EVAR was still independently associated with reduced overall mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leurs et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: