Why the study?
Does DDD pacing improve left atrial appendage function compared to VVI pacing in patients with dual chamber pacemakers?
Does DDD pacing improve left atrial appendage function compared to VVI pacing in patients with dual chamber pacemakers?
DDD pacing results in significantly better left atrial appendage emptying and filling compared to VVI pacing, potentially explaining the lower thromboembolic risk associated with dual-chamber pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports DDD over VVI for left atrial appendage function; extends mechanistic basis for lower thromboembolic risk with dual-chamber pacing.
Simantirakis et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: