Why the study?
Does coronary angiography with Renografin-76 affect intraventricular conduction in patients with pre-existing conduction abnormalities?
Does coronary angiography with Renografin-76 affect intraventricular conduction in patients with pre-existing conduction abnormalities?
Coronary angiography with Renografin-76 does not worsen intraventricular conduction in patients with pre-existing delays, suggesting prophylactic temporary pacemakers are unnecessary.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support avoiding routine pacing in conduction disease; leaves open effects of modern contrast in larger cohorts.
Conduction disturbances have been reported to occur during coronary angiography. We evaluated the response of the intraventricular conduction system during coronary angiography utilizing Renografin-76 in 22 patients. None had hemodynamically significant coronary arterial lesions. Ten had normal intraventricular conduction. Twelve were abnormal: 6 patients had right bundle branch block, 3 patients had right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock, and 3 patients had left bundle branch block. Several leads of electrocardiogram were simultaneously recorded with a bipolar eavitary His bundle electrogram before, control, and during right and left coronary angiography. All patients received Atropine prior to coronary angiography. The following measurements were analyzed: heart rate (HR), atrium to His bundle (AH) interval, and His bundle to ventricle (HV) interval. Right coronary arteriography produced a significant increase in atrium to His bundle interval indicating the depressing effect of contrast agent in the atrioventricular node. However, no change in intraventricular conduction time (His bundle to ventricle interval) was observed in either the normal or abnormal patients. These results indicate that Renografin-76 does not affect the intraventricular conduction system, even in the presence of intraventricular conduction delay. Placement of temporary pacemaker in patients with intraventricular conduction delay during coronary angiography does not seem necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langou et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: