Why the study?
4D flow MRI comprehensively assesses heart valve hemodynamics but relies on manual plane analysis, motivating automated detection and tracking of aortic and mitral valve planes.
Can machine learning-assisted dynamic valve tracking accurately and reproducibly quantify aortic and mitral hemodynamics from 4D flow MRI compared to static plane analysis?
Can machine learning-assisted dynamic valve tracking accurately and reproducibly quantify aortic and mitral hemodynamics from 4D flow MRI compared to static plane analysis?
Machine learning can efficiently and reproducibly automate aortic and mitral valve tracking for 4D flow MRI hemodynamic quantification.
Automated valve plane tracking is feasible in 4D flow MRI; leaves open whether it improves accuracy or workflow over manual analysis.
Background Blood flow is a crucial measurement in the assessment of heart valve disease. Time-resolved flow using magnetic resonance imaging (4 D flow MRI) can provide a comprehensive assessment of heart valve hemodynamics but it relies in manual plane analysis. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of automate the detection and tracking of aortic and mitral valve planes to assess blood flow from 4 D flow MRI. Methods In this prospective study, a total of n = 106 subjects were enrolled: 19 patients with mitral disease, 65 aortic disease patients and 22 healthy controls. Machine learning was employed to detect aortic and mitral location and motion in a cine three-chamber plane and a perpendicular projection was co-registered to the 4 D flow MRI dataset to quantify flow volume, regurgitant fraction, and a peak velocity. Static and dynamic plane association and agreement were evaluated. Intra- and inter-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility were also assessed. Results Aortic regurgitant fraction was elevated in aortic valve disease patients as compared with controls and mitral valve disease patients ( p < 0.05). Similarly, mitral regurgitant fraction was higher in mitral valve patients ( p < 0.05). Both aortic and mitral total flow were high in aortic patients. Static and dynamic were good (r > 0.6, p < 0.005) for aortic total flow and peak velocity, and mitral peak velocity and regurgitant fraction. All measurements showed good inter- and intra-observer, and scan-rescan reproducibility. Conclusion We demonstrated that aortic and mitral hemodynamics can efficiently be quantified from 4 D flow MRI using assisted valve detection with machine learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: