Why the study?
What is the prevalence and anatomic distribution of pulmonary embolism in patients clinically suspected of having PE?
What is the prevalence and anatomic distribution of pulmonary embolism in patients clinically suspected of having PE?
In patients with suspected PE, the prevalence was 27%, with a significant proportion (22%) having isolated subsegmental emboli.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides contemporary prevalence data in suspected PE; leaves open the prognostic importance of isolated subsegmental emboli.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and anatomic distribution of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a group of consecutive patients clinically suspected of having PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients clinically suspected of having PE were examined in six Dutch hospitals from May 1997 through March 1998. Patients underwent ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scintigraphy, spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and/or digital subtraction pulmonary angiography according to a strict diagnostic protocol. Independent readers reviewed all of the diagnostic image studies in centralized readings. The largest pulmonary arterial branch in which PE was detected was recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of PE was 27% (130 of 487 patients). There was a significant difference in PE size between the high-probability and nondiagnostic V-P scans: The high-probability scans tended to depict larger emboli, but they also showed small subsegmental emboli. Twenty-nine (22%) of 130 patients had subsegmental PE; 23 of these 29 patients had a high-probability V-P scan. CONCLUSION: The largest pulmonary arterial branch with PE was central or lobar in 66 (51%), segmental in 35 (27%), and isolated subsegmental in 29 (22%) patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monyé et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: