Brief acidic reperfusion protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat hearts, but this effect is not mediated by NHE1 inhibition, which proved detrimental.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acidic reperfusion may protect rat hearts from I/R injury; leaves open clinical translation and NHE1-independent mechanisms.
BACKGROUND: Ischemic postconditioning (PostC), i.e. brief ischemia-reperfusion cycles before full reperfusion, is protective against cardiac ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Inhibition of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE1 and delayed intracellular pH-normalization have been proposed to underlie protection by PostC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used Langendorff perfused rat hearts exposed to 35 min global ischemia to show that 15 min acidic (pH 6.5) treatment at onset of reperfusion decreased infarct size and functional deterioration at least to the same extent as PostC. In contrast, NHE1 inhibition by EIPA was detrimental. To evaluate HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes as a cellular model for PostC, we exposed the cells to simulated ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) mimicking that in perfused hearts. Necrosis and apoptosis induced by I/R were unaffected by 15 min of pH 6.0 at onset of reperfusion. I/R increased the activity of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase 1/2 (JNK1/2) and Akt, but not of p38 MAPK, with no further effect of acidic reperfusion or EIPA. CONCLUSION: In rat hearts, 15 min acidic reperfusion improves myocardial performance at least as much as does PostC, whereas NHE1 inhibition is detrimental. In contrast, in HL-1 cardiomyocytes, acidic reperfusion or NHE1 inhibition affect neither survival nor JNK1/2-, Akt-, and p38 MAPK activity after I/R, pointing to different mechanisms of damage and protection in these systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: