Why the study?
Catheter ablation on a beating heart is subject to contact force variability, complicating the delivery of consistently durable and transmural radiofrequency lesions.
Does a catheter contact-force controller improve contact force stability and lesion reproducibility compared to manual ablation in preclinical models?
Does a catheter contact-force controller improve contact force stability and lesion reproducibility compared to manual ablation in preclinical models?
A novel contact-force controller maintains constant force and eliminates the effect of motion on lesion volume during radiofrequency ablation in preclinical models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance force stability and lesion reproducibility; hypothesis-generating for clinical ablation outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter-tissue contact force is a determinant of radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion effectiveness. However, ablation on a beating heart is subject to force variability, making it difficult to optimally deliver consistently durable and transmural lesions. This work evaluates improvements in contact force stability and lesion reproducibility by using a catheter contact-force controller (CFC) during lesion delivery in vitro and in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a sheath and force-sensing catheter, an experienced operator attempted to maintain a constant force of 20 g at targets within the atria and left ventricle of a pig manually and using the CFC; the average force and contact-force variation (CFV) achieved using each approach were compared. Ablation lesions (20 W, 30 seconds, 17 mL/min irrigation) were created in bovine tissue samples mounted on a platform programmed to reproduce clinically relevant motion. CFC-assisted lesions were delivered to stationary and moving tissue with forces of 5 to 35 g. Mimicking manual intervention, lesions were also delivered to moving tissue while the CFC was disabled. Resultant lesion volumes were compared using two-way analysis of variance. When using the CFC, the average force was within 1 g of the set level, with a CFV less than 5 g, during both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Reproducible and statistically identical (P = .82) lesion volumes proportional to the set force were achieved in both stationary and moving tissue when the CFC was used. CONCLUSIONS: CFC assistance maintains constant force in vivo and removes effect of motion on lesion volume during RF lesion delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: