Why the study?
Are serum ICTP levels associated with carotid atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Are serum ICTP levels associated with carotid atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Serum ICTP concentrations may serve as a non-invasive biomarker for systemic atherosclerosis, correlating with carotid IMT and arterial stiffness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serum ICTP correlated with carotid IMT in at-risk patients; leaves open its value as atherosclerosis biomarker pending prospective studies.
Carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) is generated through matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-dependent type I collagen digestion, and has been widely utilized as a biomarker for bone turnover. The fact that atherosclerotic lesions are rich in both type I collagen and MMP-producing macrophages led to the hypothesis that serum ICTP concentrations may serve as a non-invasive clinical biomarker for atherosclerosis. Therefore, the association of serum ICTP concentrations with the maximum intima-media thickness (IMT) of carotid arteries, a surrogate index of systemic atherosclerosis, or brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in patients with atherosclerotic risk factors was evaluated. A total of 52 male and 65 female (mean age: 62.8 yrs) patients without renal failure, malignancies or bone diseases known to affect serum ICTP concentrations were recruited. Patients with max IMTs ≥1.1 mm showed significantly higher serum ICTP concentrations compared with patients with max IMTs <1.1 mm (3.33 ± 0.97 vs 2.82 ± 0.65 ng/mL, p<0.05). Serum ICTP concentration was also positively correlated with max IMT (p<0.001) or baPWV values (p<0.05). Multivariate analyses also revealed that serum ICTP concentrations were correlated with max IMT (p<0.001; 95% CI 0.200 to 0.454). These results suggest that serum ICTP concentrations can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for systemic atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kondo et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: