Why the study?
Do the cold pressor test and nitroglycerin administration reveal differences in abdominal aortic dilation between normal males and smokers?
Do the cold pressor test and nitroglycerin administration reveal differences in abdominal aortic dilation between normal males and smokers?
Ultrasound measurement of abdominal aortic diameter during the cold pressor test and after nitroglycerin provides a noninvasive model to assess endothelial-dependent and independent vascular relaxation, demonstrating impairment in smokers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attenuated aortic dilation in smokers detectable by ultrasound; supports hypothesis-generating endothelial assessment but leaves open clinical utility.
Coronary vascular responses to the cold pressor test (CPT) have been shown to parallel changes caused by infusion of acetylcholine. Whereas the CPT is a method of assessing endothelial-dependent vasodilation, nitroglycerin produces endothelial-independent vasodilation. We performed histological studies on autopsy specimens of abdominal aorta and demonstrated that it is predominantly muscular artery. To test the hypothesis that vasodilatory responses of the abdominal aorta to interventions would parallel those of peripheral vessels, 33 normal males without hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia, and 10 younger male smokers had ultrasound imaging of the abdominal aorta conducted in the control state, 2 minutes after immersion of the hand in cold water and 10 minutes after rewarming the hand (i.e., cold pressor test). The internal diameter of the abdominal aorta at the onset of the QRS complex was determined for each intervention by averaging 4 beats. It was found that the cold pressor test and nitroglycerin resulted in similar degrees of dilation of the abdominal aorta in nonsmoking subjects, and that these responses were attenuated in smokers. Thus, both endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular relaxation were impaired in smokers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandraratna et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: