Key result
Complete revascularization cuts cardiovascular death ~38% vs culprit-only in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Why the study?
The prognostic impact of revascularization of non-culprit lesions in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease needed investigation across randomized clinical trials.
Does complete revascularization reduce cardiovascular death in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=6,528)
Does complete revascularization reduce cardiovascular death in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.62 (95% CI 0.39–0.97)
Number Needed to Treat: 70
In STEMI patients with multivessel disease, complete revascularization significantly reduces cardiovascular death, MI, and the need for repeated revascularization compared to culprit-only PCI.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We strongly challenge this interpretation, as the conclusion is surely too optimistic and may mislead clinicians”
Supports complete revascularization in multivessel STEMI; confirms cardiovascular mortality reduction in meta-analysis of RCTs.
AIMS: The aim of this work was to investigate the prognostic impact of revascularization of non-culprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease by performing a meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from six RCTs comparing complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease were analysed with random effect generic inverse variance method meta-analysis. The endpoints were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death. Main secondary outcomes of interest were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeated coronary revascularization. Overall, 6528 patients were included (3139 complete group, 3389 culprit-only group). After a follow-up ranging between 1 and 3 years (median 2 years), cardiovascular death was significantly reduced in the group receiving complete revascularization (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, I2 = 29%). The number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular death was 70 (95% CI 36-150). The secondary endpoints MI and revascularization were also significantly reduced (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84, I2 = 0% and HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.22-0.38, I2 = 36%, respectively). Needed to treats were 45 (95% CI 37-55) for MI and 8 (95% CI 5-13) for revascularization. All-cause death (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.16, I2 = 27%) was not affected by the revascularization strategy. CONCLUSION: In a selected study population of STEMI patients with multivessel disease, a complete revascularization strategy is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death. This reduction is concomitant with that of MI and the need of repeated revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavasini et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (n=6,528). Complete revascularization vs. Culprit-only revascularization was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.97). Complete revascularization significantly reduced cardiovascular death compared to culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: