Why the study?
Most studies assessing LV systolic function by conventional LVEF have failed to detect differences between non-dippers and dippers.
Does a non-dipping blood pressure pattern associate with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to a dipping pattern?
Does a non-dipping blood pressure pattern associate with worse left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to a dipping pattern?
Speckle tracking echocardiography can unmask early left ventricular systolic dysfunction (reduced global longitudinal strain) in non-dippers that is not detectable by conventional ejection fraction.
GLS detects subclinical LV systolic impairment in non-dippers missed by LVEF; extends meta-analytic evidence linking non-dipping to HMOD.
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that a reduced nocturnal fall in blood pressure (BP) entails an increased risk of hypertensive-mediated organ damage (HMOD) and cardiovascular events. Most studies focusing on left ventricular (LV) systolic function, assessed by conventional LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in non-dippers compared to dippers failed to detect significant differences. To provide a new piece of information on LV systolic dysfunction in the non-dipping setting, we performed a meta-analysis of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) studies investigating LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), a more sensitive index of LV systolic function. METHODS: A computerized search was performed using PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases from inception until 31 July, 2022. Full articles reporting data on LV GLS and LVEF in non-dippers and dippers were considered suitable. RESULTS: A total of 648 non-dipper and 530 dipper individuals were included in 9 studies. LV GLS was worse in non-dipper than in their dipper counterparts (-18.4 ± 0.30 vs. -20.1 ± 0.23%, standard means difference [SMD]: 0.73 ± 0.14, confidence interval [CI]: 0.46/1.00, P < 0.0001) whereas this was not the case for LVEF (61.4 ± 0.8 and 62.0 ± 0.8%, respectively), SMD: --0.15 ± 0.09, CI: -0.32/0.03, P = 1.01). A meta-regression analysis between nighttime systolic BP and myocardial GLS showed a significant, relationship between these variables (coefficient 0.085, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that early changes in LV systolic function not detectable by conventional echocardiography in the non-dipping setting can be unmasked by STE; implementation of STE in current practice may improve the detection of HMOD of adverse prognostic significance in individuals with altered circadian BP rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuspidi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: