Why the study?
Does short-period blood pressure monitoring accurately predict 24-hour average blood pressure in ambulant subjects?
Does short-period blood pressure monitoring accurately predict 24-hour average blood pressure in ambulant subjects?
Monitoring blood pressure over a period of a few hours cannot provide a precise estimate of the 24-hour average blood pressure, emphasizing the necessity of full 24-hour monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short BP subperiods may inaccurately estimate 24-h means; leaves open whether abbreviated ambulatory protocols suffice for clinical or research use.
Evidence has been produced that average 24-h or day-time blood pressure (BP) values provide a better diagnosis of hypertension and a better prediction of its risk than BP values provided by one or few isolated measurements. This has led to a number of attempts to simplify the time-consuming procedure necessary to obtain this information and to identify short periods during the 24 h when average BP might closely reflect the 24-h or day-time average values. In 40 ambulant subjects BP was recorded intra-arterially for 24 h using the Oxford method. The BP signal was analysed beat-to-beat by a computer to obtain the average 24-h mean BP values. This value was compared with the mean BP average values obtained by beat-to-beat analysis of subperiods of the same recording, ranging from 30 min to 12 h in duration. For each duration the analysis was performed on 48 different subperiods, each shifted by 30 min from the preceding one, so that every time interval within the 24 h was considered. Throughout the 24-h period the average mean BP values obtained by the analysis of the 30-min subperiods showed very marked differences compared to the 24-h mean BP average. The differences between the subperiod and 24-h values showed a progressive reduction as the subperiod duration was increased. Their magnitude, however, was still marked for subperiods of 2 and 4 h, and only showed a clear-cut attenuation when the subperiods encompassed 12 h. The magnitude and the sign of all the subperiod and 24-h differences showed a large variability among subjects. Similar results were observed when the comparisons were between day-time subperiods and the corresponding day-time average value. These findings demonstrate that average BP values obtained by monitoring BP over a period of a few hours during the day or night cannot provide a precise estimate of the 24-h or the day-time average BP. This rules out the possibility of shortening the procedure necessary to obtain this important information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rienzo et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: