Why the study?
Does aerobic exercise training improve metabolic and autonomic parameters in young obese female mice?
Does aerobic exercise training improve metabolic and autonomic parameters in young obese female mice?
Aerobic exercise training in young obese female mice attenuates weight gain and hyperglycemia while improving autonomic function and blood pressure variability.
Exercise training benefits obese mice models; leaves open translation to human cardiometabolic care.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the metabolic and autonomic parameters in trained youth obese mice. Female ob/ob mice (4 weeks old) were randomized into sedentary (OS, n=11) or trained (OT, n=8) (treadmill,5 days/w, 60 min/d, during 8 wks) groups. Blood glucose was measured by reagent strips. Blood pressure signals were recorded using a data acquisition system. The OT group had higher exercise capacity compared to the OS group. OT group had reduced body weight, white adipose tissue and blood glucose (45±2g, 6.1±1g and 133±3g mg/dL) compared to OS group (50±2g, 6.1±1g and 169±8 mg/dL). Exercise training improved glucose tolerance in trained group (OS: 27961±6501 vs. OT: 18258±6283 mg/dL/min). Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were similar between groups. The trained group showed increase in heart rate variability compared with sedentary group (OT: 50±12 vs. OS: 33±8ms 2 ). Blood pressure variability and low frequency band were higher in OS group (23 ± 3mmHg 2 and 7 ± 1 mmHg 2 ) compared to OT (15 ± 2 mmHg 2 and 5 ± 1 mmHg 2 ). Moreover, the spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, represented by alpha index, was lower in sedentary group (1.2 ± 0.3 ms/mmHg) compared to trained group (1.9 ± 0.2 ms/mmHg). In conclusion, our results suggest that physical training during lifespan can be effective inattenuating the increase in weight and blood glucose and improving blood pressure variability in obese mice. FAPESP 2011/20859–0
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sartori et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: