Why the study?
The effects of continuous-moderate versus high-intensity interval aerobic training on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters in ovariectomized high-fat-fed mice had not been directly compared.
Does moderate-intensity continuous training or high-intensity interval training improve cardiometabolic parameters in ovariectomized obese mice?
Does moderate-intensity continuous training or high-intensity interval training improve cardiometabolic parameters in ovariectomized obese mice?
In an ovariectomized obese mouse model, moderate-intensity continuous training provided greater cardiovascular benefits, while high-intensity interval training offered superior metabolic improvements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal findings warrant no practice change; leaves open human translation of intensity-specific effects.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of continuous-moderate vs. high-intensity interval aerobic training on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters in ovariectomized high-fat-fed mice. C57BL/6 female ovariectomized were divided into four groups (n=8): low-fat-fed sedentary (SLF); high-fat-fed sedentary (SHF); high-fat-fed moderate-intensity continuous trained (MICT-HF); and high-fat-fed high-intensity interval aerobic trained (HIIT-HF). The high-fat diet lasted 10 weeks. Ovariectomy was performed in the fourth week. The exercise training was carried out in the last four weeks of protocol. Fasting glycemia, oral glucose tolerance, arterial pressure, baroreflex sensitivity, and cardiovascular autonomic modulation were evaluated. Moderate-intensity continuous training prevented the increase in arterial pressure and promoted a reduction in HR at rest, associated with an improvement in the sympathovagal balance in MICT-HF vs. SHF. The high-intensity interval training reduced blood glucose and glucose intolerance in HIIT-HF vs. SHF and MICT-HF. In addition, it improved sympathovagal balance in HIIT-HF vs. SHF. Moderate-intensity continuous training was more effective in promoting cardiovascular benefits, while high-intensity interval training was more effective in promoting metabolic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: