Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction . Advances in molecular biology and biotechnology have enhanced the understanding of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) biology and facilitated the identification of patient subgroups that may potentially benefit from novel therapeutic approaches. Objective . The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with locallyadvanced/metastatic TNBC in real-world clinical practice in the Russian Federation. Methods . This retrospective multicenter study included 65 patients with metastatic TNBC who received the atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the second line of treatment and patients with early progression following neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (≤12 months, primary resistance population) from October 2019 to September 2023 in routine clinical practice. Results. At the median follow-up of 11.5 months the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.43 months (95 % CI, 6.59–16.28) in the ITT population. There was only factor associated with worsened mPFS – recurrence-free interval of ≤12 months following anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. mPFS was 15.8 months for primary metastatic or anthracycline/taxane-sensitive TNBC vs. 6.4 months for primary resistance population (OR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.54–0.97; p=0.03). A trend towards improved PFS was observed in the BRCA1/2 wt subgroup and patients with objective response. The mPFS for BRCA1/2 wt patients was 13.9 months vs. 5.6 months for BRCA1/2 mut patients (p=0.14). mPFS in patients with an objective response was 21.9 months vs 13.9 months in those without an objective response (p=0.63). Conclusions . This analysis represents the first multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of the combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in real-world clinical practice in Russian population. The combination allows for an objective response rate of 20 % and mPFS of 11.43 months for patients as in the second line of treatment as with primary resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganshina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: