Why the study?
Is there a difference in platelet alpha2-adrenoreceptor density between patients with major depression and healthy controls, and does it correlate with symptom severity?
Is there a difference in platelet alpha2-adrenoreceptor density between patients with major depression and healthy controls, and does it correlate with symptom severity?
While platelet alpha2-adrenoreceptor density does not differ between depressed patients and controls, it correlates positively with the severity of depressive symptoms.
Does not distinguish depressed patients from controls by alpha2-adrenoreceptor density; leaves open Bmax as a potential severity correlate for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in different parameters of the norepinephrine system have been widely described in major depression. The presence of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors in blood platelets, similar to those in the brain, prompted us to evaluate them in depressed patients, as compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Fifteen outpatients affected by major depression, according to DSM IV criteria, and 15 comparable healthy control subjects, were included in the study. The alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors were measured by means of the specific binding of [(3)H]rauwolscine, a highly selective antagonist for this receptor subtype. The severity of depression was assessed by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). RESULTS: The results did not show any difference in [(3)H]rauwolscine binding parameters (B(max) and K(d)) between patients and controls. However, in the patients, a significant and positive correlation between B(max), which measures the density of the receptors, and HRSD total score was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, although no change in alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors seems to occur in major depression, the density of these receptors would seem to be related to the severity of depressive symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marazziti et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: