Why the study?
Does the A/C1166 gene polymorphism of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor influence biventricular function or the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with a first acute anterior MI?
Does the A/C1166 gene polymorphism of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor influence biventricular function or the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with a first acute anterior MI?
The A/C1166 polymorphism of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor does not appear to influence the risk of acute myocardial infarction or subsequent biventricular function.
Null A/C1166 findings in anterior MI do not support genotyping for risk or function; leaves open other genetic contributors to post-MI remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Although there have been several association studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R, A/C1166) gene polymorphism in clinical endpoints such as myocardial infarction (MI), hypertension, aortic stiffness, and left ventricular mass, the relationship between AT1R polymorphism and biventricular function in acute anterior MI has not been studied before. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group comprised 132 consecutive patients who were admitted to the coronary care unit with their first acute anterior MI. Systolic and diastolic diameters, volumes, inflow properties, ejection fraction and myocardial performance index of both ventricles were measured. AT1R polymorphism was determined using polymerase chain reaction amplification. Based on A/C1166 polymorphism of AT1R, the patients were classified into 3 groups: group 1, A/A (n=91) genotype, group 2 A/C (n=28), and group 3 C/C (n=13) genotype. When the left ventricular and right ventricular echocardiographic functions were compared, all parameters of the 3 groups were found to be similar. No difference was detected in either the genotype distribution or allele frequencies between the patients and the controls for AT1R. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that A/C1166 polymorphism of AT1R did not influence the risk of either acute MI or biventricular function after anterior MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ülgen et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: