This review highlights the pathophysiologic and socioeconomic factors contributing to disparities in acute heart failure among African Americans, emphasizing the need for culturally and clinically tailored care.
May warrant culturally tailored HF care in African Americans; leaves open prospective validation of disparity-reducing strategies.
BACKGROUND: African Americans (AAs) are disproportionately affected by acute heart failure (AHF) compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Disparities in AHF risk factors among AAs are attributed to higher rates of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, lower socioeconomic status, higher dietary caloric and salt intake, and biologic/genetic differences. However, AAs are frequently underrepresented in AHF clinical trials, and race-related differences in risks and clinical outcomes are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to review published data on AHF in the AA population, including management strategies that may differ based on race and common barriers to optimal care. METHODS: Publications were identified in Pubmed (through June 10, 2013) with the use of the search strategy terms (acute heart failure) AND (black OR African American OR racial). RESULTS: Racial disparities in the quality of AHF care are relatively uncommon; however, racial differences in pathophysiology have resulted in differing pharmacologic recommendations (eg, isosorbide dinitrate plus hydralazine is indicated only in AAs). Various socioeconomic factors influence disease progression, treatment compliance, and hospitalization/rehospitalization rates. CONCLUSIONS: Further research would enhance understanding of pathophysiologic heart failure differences between racial groups. Programs are needed that incorporate known clinical and cultural differences to improve quality of care and reduce the disease burden of AHF for all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuyjet et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: