Key result
The detection rate of Epsilon wave was significantly higher in ARVD/C probands compared to involved family members (65% vs 22%, P=0.03).
Observational (n=49)
Absolute Event Rate: 65% vs 22%
p-value: p=0.03
The presence of an Epsilon wave in ARVD/C is significantly correlated with markers of progressive disease, including diffuse right ventricular involvement and other ECG abnormalities.
May mark progressive ARVD/C; leaves open its screening utility in relatives pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: Epsilon wave is a major criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). We sought to study systematically characteristics of Epsilon wave in ARVD/C patients from the southern Chinese population. METHODS: The population included 49 patients with ARVD/C meeting the diagnostic criteria. They were analyzed for the value of different electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria including Epsilon wave, the ones of 24-hour Holter recording, signal-averaged ECG, and echocardiography to learn the correlation between Epsilon wave and other variability with the use of nonparametric test. A probability value of < or =0.05 was considered significantly different. RESULTS: It shown that the detection rate of Epsilon wave was significantly higher in probands (65%) than involved family members (22%), P = 0.03. In the conventional as well as Fontaine leads, its detection rate were 18 (37%) and 28 (57%), respectively. The prevalence of diffuse right ventricle involvement, T-wave inversion and signal-averaged ECG are significantly different between the ARVD/C patients with Epsilon wave and without Epsilon wave. CONCLUSION: It is significantly correlated between Epsilon wave and the progressive ARVD/C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) (n=49). Proband status vs. Involved family members was evaluated on Epsilon wave detection rate (p=0.03). The detection rate of Epsilon wave was significantly higher in ARVD/C probands compared to involved family members (65% vs 22%, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: