Key result
During artificially induced hypothermia, ear canal pulse oximetry failed in only 1 of 15 volunteers compared to 5 of 15 volunteers using conventional finger pulse oximetry.
Why the study?
Does an ear canal PPG sensor improve the reliability of SpO2 and NPA measurements compared to a finger sensor during hypothermia-induced poor peripheral perfusion in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does an ear canal PPG sensor improve the reliability of SpO2 and NPA measurements compared to a finger sensor during hypothermia-induced poor peripheral perfusion in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.7% vs 33.3%
An ear canal pulse oximeter provides more reliable photoplethysmography signals and SpO2 estimates than a conventional finger sensor during cold-induced peripheral vasoconstriction.
May support ear canal pulse oximetry during hypothermia; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical adoption.
Pulse oximeters rely on the technique of photoplethysmography (PPG) to estimate arterial oxygen saturation (SpO[Formula: see text]). In conditions of poor peripheral perfusion such as hypotension, hypothermia, and vasoconstriction, the PPG signals detected are often weak and noisy, or in some cases unobtainable. Hence, pulse oximeters produce erroneous SpO[Formula: see text] readings in these circumstances. The problem arises as most commercial pulse oximeter probes are designed to be attached to peripheral sites such as the finger or toe, which are easily affected by vasoconstriction. In order to overcome this problem, the ear canal was investigated as an alternative site for measuring reliable SpO[Formula: see text] on the hypothesis that blood flow to this central site is preferentially preserved. A novel miniature ear canal PPG sensor was developed along with a state of the art PPG processing unit to investigate PPG measurements from the bottom surface of the ear canal. An in vivo study was carried out in 15 healthy volunteers to validate the developed technology. In this comparative study, red and infrared PPGs were acquired from the ear canal and the finger of the volunteers, whilst they were undergoing artificially induced hypothermia by means of cold exposure (10 [Formula: see text]C). Normalised Pulse Amplitude (NPA) and SpO[Formula: see text] was calculated from the PPG signals acquired from the ear canal and the finger. Good quality baseline PPG signals with high signal-to-noise ratio were obtained from both the PPG sensors. During cold exposure, significant differences were observed in the NPA of the finger PPGs. The mean NPA of the red and infrared PPGs from the finger have dropped by >80%. Contrary to the finger, the mean NPA of red and infrared ear canal PPGs had dropped only by 0.2 and 13% respectively. The SpO[Formula: see text]s estimated from the finger sensor have dropped below 90% in five volunteers (failure) by the end of the cold exposure. The ear canal sensor, on the other hand, had only failed in one volunteer. These results strongly suggest that the ear canal may be used as a suitable alternative site for monitoring PPGs and arterial blood oxygen saturation at times were peripheral perfusion is compromised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budidha et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (hypothermia model) (n=15). Ear canal pulse oximetry vs. Finger pulse oximetry was evaluated on Pulse oximetry failure (SpO2 < 90%) during cold exposure. During artificially induced hypothermia, ear canal pulse oximetry failed in only 1 of 15 volunteers compared to 5 of 15 volunteers using conventional finger pulse oximetry.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: