Why the study?
Does perindopril 4-8 mg once daily improve 24-hour blood pressure control compared to enalapril 10-20 mg once daily in patients with hypertension?
Does perindopril 4-8 mg once daily improve 24-hour blood pressure control compared to enalapril 10-20 mg once daily in patients with hypertension?
Perindopril provides a more sustained 24-hour blood pressure effect with a better trough-to-peak ratio compared to enalapril, without excessive peak effect.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports perindopril for more sustained BP lowering versus enalapril; extends comparative ACE inhibitor data in hypertension.
ACE inhibitors are important therapeutic agents in controlling hypertension, correcting some of its pathophysiological derangement and improving its prognosis. While there are many such agents, there may be some important differences between them. This placebo run-in, double blind, crossover study, using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, compares the efficacy of perindopril 4-8 mg and enalapril 10-20 mg as once daily antihypertensive agents on 32 patients. For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), perindopril had a placebo-corrected peak (P) reduction of blood pressure (BP) of -6.4 +/- 1.3 mmHg vs its placebo-corrected trough (T) of -5.2 +/- 1.7 mmHg. Enalapril had a reduction in DBP of -8.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P) and -5.7 +/- 1.7 mmHg (T). For systolic blood pressure (SBP), perindopril had a reduction of -7.5 +/- 1.6 mmHg (P) vs -7.3 +/- 2.2 mmHg (T) compared to enalapril with -10.8 +/- 1.6 mmHg (P) vs -8.3 +/- 2.3 mmHg (T). Placebo-corrected trough-to-peak ratio (SBP/DBP) for perindopril was 0.97/0.81 vs 0.77/0.67 for enalapril. There was no difference noted in 24-hour mean BP, area under the curve or post-dose casual BP measurements. Both perindopril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles. Perindopril thus had a predictable and sustained blood pressure effect giving a 24-hour cover for the patient without excessive peak effect or poor trough effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusoff et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: