Key result
Individuals with a dietary index for gut microbiota score of 5 or higher had a 34% lower risk of sleep disorders compared to those with scores of 3 or lower (OR 0.66).
Why the study?
The specific relationship between the dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and sleep pathophysiology required further elucidation.
Does a higher dietary index for gut microbiota reduce the prevalence of sleep disorders in the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=14,675)
Does a higher dietary index for gut microbiota reduce the prevalence of sleep disorders in the general population?
Odds Ratio: 0.66 (95% CI 0.52–0.85)
p-value: p=0.002
A diet favorable to gut microbiota is associated with a lower prevalence of sleep disorders, an effect partially mediated by cardiovascular health metrics (Life's Essential 8).
DI-GM association with sleep disorders is hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before any clinical dietary recommendations.
Background The research sought to examine the correlation between the dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and sleep disorders. The specific relationship between DI-GM and sleep pathophysiology requires further elucidation. Methods: The data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) across six cycles over the years 2007 to 2018. We applied logistic regression analyses with multivariable adjustments with sample weighting to assess the independent associations of DI-GM, its beneficial and unfavorable subcomponents, with sleep disorders prevalence, reporting effect estimates as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). We used restricted cubic spline (RCS) models to evaluate relationships between dose and response, and subgroup analyses to explore effect modifications. We used mediation analysis to assess the intermediary role of mLE8 (Modified Life’s Essential 8) and all its components. Results After full adjustment, higher DI-GM and DI-GM beneficial scores were found to be associated with a reduction in sleep disorders (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86–0.97; OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85–0.96, respectively). Individuals whose DI-GM was 5 or above had a 34% decreased chance of sleep disorders compared to those with scores of 3 or less (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85), while DI-GM beneficial scores ≥6 reduced the risk by 35% compared to those with scores ≤1 (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85). RCS showed a non-linear negative trend for DI-GM ( p < 0.001; nonlinear p = 0.046) and a non-linear association for DI-GM beneficial ( p < 0.001; non-linear p = 0.023) with sleep disorders. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations among male individuals, current smokers, individuals consuming ≥12 alcoholic drinks/year, and those without hypertension, diabetes, or depression ( p < 0.05). After full adjustment for covariates, mLE8 exhibited a significant mediating role in the associations of both DI-GM (14.46% mediated effect, p < 0.001) and DI-GM beneficial (12.99% mediated effect, p < 0.001) with sleep disorders. With all components of mLE8, only the nicotine exposure mediated 3.44% of the association between DI-GM and sleep disorders. Conclusion Elevated DI-GM and DI-GM beneficial scores are associated with reduced incidence of sleep disorders. mLE8 mediates the associations of both DI-GM and DI-GM beneficial with sleep disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Sleep disorders (n=14,675). Dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) vs. Lower DI-GM scores (≤3) was evaluated on Prevalence of sleep disorders (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85, p=0.002). Individuals with a dietary index for gut microbiota score of 5 or higher had a 34% lower risk of sleep disorders compared to those with scores of 3 or lower (OR 0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: