Key result
The RESCUE BT 2 trial is designed to evaluate whether intravenous tirofiban improves functional outcomes at 90 days compared with aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Tirofiban is effective in acute coronary syndromes, but whether it improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke remains unknown.
Does intravenous tirofiban improve functional outcomes compared with aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset?
RCT (n=1,158)
Double-blind, double-dummy
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does intravenous tirofiban improve functional outcomes compared with aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset?
Tirofiban may reduce early neurological deterioration versus aspirin in acute ischemic stroke; extends ACS evidence to non-reperfused patients.
BACKGROUND: Tirofiban is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. However, it remains unknown whether it improves outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVE: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of tirofiban compared with aspirin for acute ischemic stroke within 24 h after symptom onset. METHODS AND DESIGN: The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Compared with Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke (RESCUE BT 2) Trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter clinical trial. Up to 1158 eligible patients will be consecutively randomized to receive antiplatelet therapy with tirofiban or aspirin in 1:1 ratio across approximately 100 stroke centers in China. OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcomes defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization. Lead safety endpoints include mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 h after treatment. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: ChiCTR2000029502 (www.chictr.org.cn).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zi et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke (n=1,158). Intravenous tirofiban vs. Aspirin was evaluated on Proportion of patients with excellent functional outcomes defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization. The RESCUE BT 2 trial is designed to evaluate whether intravenous tirofiban improves functional outcomes at 90 days compared with aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: