Key result
S-amlodipine 5 mg/d was bioequivalent to amlodipine 10 mg/d for blood pressure and heart rate control, while demonstrating better tolerability and a lower incidence of peripheral edema.
Why the study?
Does S-amlodipine 5 mg/d provide similar blood pressure reduction with fewer side effects compared to amlodipine 10 mg/d?
Does S-amlodipine 5 mg/d provide similar blood pressure reduction with fewer side effects compared to amlodipine 10 mg/d?
S-amlodipine 5 mg/d is bioequivalent to amlodipine 10 mg/d for blood pressure control but offers improved tolerability with less peripheral edema.
May reduce edema risk in hypertension therapy; leaves open confirmation by prospective RCTs.
The review presents the latest evidence on the calcium antagonist amlodipine, summarizing its mechanisms of action, its pleiotropic, endothelial function-related effects, and its anti-atherogenic activity. Amlodipine suppresses the proliferation of vascular smooth myocytes and extracellular matrix and improves endothelial vasodilatation, despite the absence of L-type calcium channels in these cells. This mechanism is related to an increase in endothelial nitric oxide (NO) release. The results of experimental studies on the role of S and R amlodipine isomers in its hemodynamic and pleiotropic activity are presented. While S-amlodipine is a pharmacologically active blocker of L-type calcium channels, R-amlodipine increases endothelial NO release. New medications have been developed, based on S-amlodipine. It has been shown that S-amlodipine 5 mg/d is bioequivalent to amlodipine 10 mg/d. The pharmacodynamics analysis demonstrated that S-amlodipine 5 mg/d and amlodipine 10 mg/d did not differ significantly in terms of mean levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, or mean heart rate. S-amlodipine was better tolerated and characterised by a lower incidence of peripheral edema than amlodipine. However, the effects of S-amlodipine on hard end-points should be investigated in the long-term prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
М. В. Леонова (2011) reported a review. S-amlodipine vs. amlodipine 10 mg/d was evaluated. S-amlodipine 5 mg/d was bioequivalent to amlodipine 10 mg/d for blood pressure and heart rate control, while demonstrating better tolerability and a lower incidence of peripheral edema.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: