Key result
Optimal medical therapy for elderly patients with heart failure involves a tailored regimen of diuretics, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and beta blockers, with specific additions based on ejection fraction.
This review outlines a step-wise approach to the pharmacological and device management of systolic and diastolic heart failure in elderly patients.
Supports tailored OMT in elderly HF; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs to guide practice.
Underlying causes, risk factors, and precipitating causes of heart failure (HF) should be treated. Patients with HF and an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (systolic HF) or normal left ventricular ejection fraction (diastolic HF) should be treated with diuretics if fluid retention is present, with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker if the patient cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor because of cough, angioneurotic edema, rash, or altered taste sensation, and with a beta blocker unless contraindicated. If severe systolic HF persists, an aldosterone antagonist should be added. If HF persists, isosorbide dinitrate plus hydralazine should be added. Calcium channel blockers should be avoided if systolic HF is present. Digoxin should be avoided in men and women with diastolic HF if sinus rhythm is present and in women with systolic HF. Digoxin should be given to men with systolic HF if symptoms persist, but the serum digoxin level should be maintained between 0.5 and 0.8 ng/ml. Cardiac synchronized pacing should be considered in patients with severe systolic HF despite optimal medical therapy, with sinus rhythm, and with ventricular dyssynchrony.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilbert S. Aronow (2005) conducted a review in Heart failure. Heart failure medications was evaluated. Optimal medical therapy for elderly patients with heart failure involves a tailored regimen of diuretics, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and beta blockers, with specific additions based on ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: