Key result
Intravenous aspirin administered before reperfusion did not significantly reduce infarct size in dogs with a residual critical stenosis compared to saline.
Why the study?
Does intravenous aspirin reduce infarct size in a dog model of coronary occlusion and reperfusion with residual critical stenosis?
Does intravenous aspirin reduce infarct size in a dog model of coronary occlusion and reperfusion with residual critical stenosis?
Intravenous aspirin administered before reperfusion does not reduce infarct size in a canine model of coronary occlusion with residual critical stenosis, despite reducing neutrophil accumulation and platelet aggregation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No infarct size benefit in this canine model; leaves open translation of aspirin's anti-inflammatory effects to human reperfusion.
Platelet-related events being associated with the increment of infarct size at reperfusion in the presence of a residual stenosis, we tested in dogs whether intravenous aspirin (ASA) could limit infarct size. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 90 min and reperfused for 6 h in the presence of a residual critical stenosis. Controls received saline, and treated groups were given 2, 6, or 12 mg/kg ASA, i.v., 5 min before reperfusion. Infarct size did not differ significantly between groups (control, 43.80+/-6.28%; ASA, 2 mg/kg: 41.07+/-7.78%; ASA, 6 mg/kg: 37.55+/-3.44%; ASA, 12 mg/kg: 29.40+/-5.41%), as well as transmural collateral blood flow and [111In]-platelet accumulation in the infarcted myocardium (2.5-3.6 x 10(5) platelets/g). However, myocardial neutrophil accumulation was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in groups given 6 (15.0+/-2.6 x 10(6)/g tissue) and 12 mg/kg (18.4 +/-3.8) ASA, but not in the 2-mg/kg group (21.0+/-5.2), as compared with control group (32.0+/-7.2). Ex vivo platelet aggregation to collagen was abolished during reperfusion in all treated groups (p < 0.05). Transcardiac arteriovenous differences in 6-keto-PGF1alpha were reduced significantly 1 h after reperfusion in groups given 6 or 12 mg/kg ASA (94.7+/-13.1 and 71.7+/-19.2 pg/ml, respectively) but not in the 2-mg/kg group (178.3+/-78.2 pg/ml), as compared with control (405.4+/-171.6 pg/ml). ASA-insensitive platelet activation at the site of stenosis or inhibition by ASA of prostacyclin production by jeopardized myocardium may explain the observed lack of benefit of ASA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Libersan et al. (1999) studied Myocardial infarction with residual critical stenosis. Intravenous aspirin vs. Saline was evaluated on Infarct size. Intravenous aspirin administered before reperfusion did not significantly reduce infarct size in dogs with a residual critical stenosis compared to saline.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: