Key result
Intravenous serelaxin increased renal plasma flow by 29% compared to 14% with placebo (13% relative increase; P=0.0386) in patients with chronic heart failure, but did not significantly affect GFR.
Why the study?
Does intravenous serelaxin improve renal plasma flow and GFR in patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=65)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does intravenous serelaxin improve renal plasma flow and GFR in patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: 13% relative increase
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.0386
In patients with chronic heart failure, intravenous serelaxin improves renal plasma flow and reduces the increase in filtration fraction without affecting GFR.
May improve renal hemodynamics in chronic HF; extends serelaxin evidence and informs targeted outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Serelaxin is a promising therapy for acute heart failure. The renal hemodynamic effects of serelaxin in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, patients with New York Heart Association Class II to III chronic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 30 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) received intravenous serelaxin 30 μg/kg per day or placebo for 24 hours. Primarily, we assessed the difference between serelaxin and placebo on renal plasma flow (para-aminohippuric acid clearance) and GFR (iothalamate clearance) over 8 to 24 hours. All 22 patients from 1 clinical site were excluded from primary analyses before unblinding because of implausible measurements. The primary analysis comprised 65 patients, mean age was 68 (±10) years, 89% were male, mean estimated GFR was 64 (±19) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and 34% had New York Heart Association Class III symptoms. Renal plasma flow increased by 29% with serelaxin and 14% with placebo (13% relative increase with serelaxin; P=0.0386), whereas GFR changes did not differ significantly during 8 to 24 hours. Filtration fraction increased by 36% with serelaxin and 62% with placebo (16% relative decrease with serelaxin; P=0.0019) during 8 to 24 hours. Changes in systolic blood pressure were largely similar, and creatinine clearance did not differ between groups. Adverse event rates were similar with serelaxin (20.5%) and placebo (25.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure, serelaxin increased renal plasma flow and reduced the increase in filtration fraction compared with placebo, but did not affect GFR. These results suggest beneficial renal hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic heart failure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01546532.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voors et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=65). Serelaxin vs. placebo was evaluated on difference between serelaxin and placebo on renal plasma flow and GFR over 8 to 24 hours (13% relative increase, p=0.0386). Intravenous serelaxin increased renal plasma flow by 29% compared to 14% with placebo (13% relative increase; P=0.0386) in patients with chronic heart failure, but did not significantly affect GFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: