Why the study?
Does treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (or saxagliptin) reduce or increase hospitalization for heart failure compared to sulfonylureas (or sitagliptin) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Does treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (or saxagliptin) reduce or increase hospitalization for heart failure compared to sulfonylureas (or sitagliptin) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
In a real-world cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (including saxagliptin) was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure compared to sulfonylureas or sitagliptin.
May indicate comparable hHF risk with DPP-4is versus SUs; leaves open causal effects and need for randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine, among patients with type 2 diabetes, the association between hospitalization for heart failure (hHF) and treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) versus sulfonylureas (SUs), and treatment with saxagliptin versus sitagliptin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study using a U.S. insurance claims database. Patients initiated treatment between 1 August 2010 and 30 August 2013, and had no use of the comparator treatments in the prior 12 months (baseline). Each comparison consisted of patients matched 1:1 on a propensity score. Time to each outcome was compared between matched groups using Cox models. Analyses were stratified by the presence of baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD). Secondary analyses examined associations between comparator treatments and other selected cardiovascular events. RESULTS: After matching, the study included 218,556 patients in comparisons of DPP-4i and SU, and 112,888 in comparisons of saxagliptin and sitagliptin. The hazard ratios (HRs) of hHF were as follows: DPP-4i versus SU (reference): HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.78-1.15), P = 0.580 for patients with baseline CVD; HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.38-0.89), P = 0.013 for patients without baseline CVD; saxagliptin versus sitagliptin (reference): HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.28), P = 0.712 for patients with baseline CVD; HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.56-1.75), P = 0.972 for patients without baseline CVD. Comparisons of the individual secondary and composite cardiovascular outcomes followed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, there was no association between hHF, or other selected cardiovascular outcomes, and treatment with a DPP-4i relative to SU or treatment with saxagliptin relative to sitagliptin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: