Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The drop in force in an actively shortening muscle is likely due primarily to the influence of motion on the configuration, rather than the number, of cross-bridges.
Low angle x-ray diffraction patterns were obtained from resting and activated frog sartorius muscles by means of a position-sensitive detector. Although the intensity ratio I10/I11 decreased many-fold upon activation, it was nearly the same during isometric and isotonic contraction. Thus, motion has a much smaller effect on the low order equatorial pattern than the transition from rest to activity. Analysis of the 10 and 11 reflections separately showed that I10 and I11 change reciprocally upon activation, and that they both increase by a small amount in the transition from isometric to isotonic contraction. If the intensity ratio can be taken as a measure of cross-bridge number, the results provide evidence that the drop in force in an actively shortening muscle is due primarily to the influence of motion on the configuration, rather than the number, of cross-bridges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Podolsky et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: