Why the study?
What is the radiation exposure to patients and operators during radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia?
What is the radiation exposure to patients and operators during radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia?
Radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia is associated with significant radiation exposure to both patients and operators, highlighting the need for strict radiation precautions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Radiation exposure varies by pathway site in SVT ablation; leaves open questions on long-term risks and optimal minimization strategies.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation has become the primary method of treatment for supraventricular tachycardia and often requires prolonged fluoroscopy times. AIM: To quantitate radiation exposure to patient and operator during RF ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosemeters were used to monitor radiation at seven sites. Positions were: patient's thyroid, left scapula, T9 vertebra, right scapula and L4-L5 vertebra and the operator's thyroid and left hand. Monitoring was performed during 22 procedures. Of the patients studied 10 (45%) had atrioventricular junctional re-entry tachycardia (AVJRT) and 12 (55%) had accessory pathway tachycardia. RESULTS: The median fluoroscopy times (minutes) and inter-quartile ranges were 46 (39-65) for AVJRT, 55 (52-60) for left free wall accessory pathway (LFW), 107 (89-140) for septal and 166 (128-176) for RFW pathways. The mean radiation doses (mGy) to the chest wall were 50 for AVJRT, 47 for LFW, 87 for septal and 151 for RFW pathways. The mean radiation to the chest wall of the patient per case was found to be 3.9 times that reported for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and 1.5 times that reported for angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation is associated with significant irradiation of the patient and operator. All precautions should be taken to decrease this exposure. If eye irradiation is assumed to be equal to that to the thyroid, more than 45 procedures per month by a single operator (using ceiling-suspended lead glass shielding) may result in exceeding the recommended dose limit to the eye.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovoor et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: